Current:Home > NewsCalifornia considers unique safety regulations for AI companies, but faces tech firm opposition -Zenith Investment School
California considers unique safety regulations for AI companies, but faces tech firm opposition
Chainkeen Exchange View
Date:2025-04-10 18:12:29
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California lawmakers are considering legislation that would require artificial intelligence companies to test their systems and add safety measures so they can’t be potentially manipulated to wipe out the state’s electric grid or help build chemical weapons — scenarios that experts say could be possible in the future as technology evolves at warp speed.
Legislators plan to vote Tuesday on this first-of-its-kind bill, which aims to reduce risks created by AI. It is fiercely opposed by tech companies, including Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, and Google. They say the regulations take aim at developers and instead should be focused on those who use and exploit the AI systems for harm.
Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener, who authors the bill, said the proposal would provide reasonable safety standards by preventing “catastrophic harms” from extremely powerful AI models that may be created in the future. The requirements would only apply to systems that cost more than $100 million in computing power to train. No current AI models have hit that threshold as of July.
“This is not about smaller AI models,” Wiener said at a recent legislative hearing. “This is about incredibly large and powerful models that, as far as we know, do not exist today but will exist in the near future.”
Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has touted California as an early AI adopter and regulator, saying the state could soon deploy generative AI tools to address highway congestion, make roads safer and provide tax guidance. At the same time, his administration is considering new rules against AI discrimination in hiring practices. He declined to comment on the bill but has warned that overregulation could put the state in a “perilous position.”
The proposal, supported by some of the most renowned AI researchers, would also create a new state agency to oversee developers and provide best practices. The state attorney general also would be able to pursue legal actions in case of violations.
A growing coalition of tech companies argue the requirements would discourage companies from developing large AI systems or keeping their technology open-source.
“The bill will make the AI ecosystem less safe, jeopardize open-source models relied on by startups and small businesses, rely on standards that do not exist, and introduce regulatory fragmentation,” Rob Sherman, Meta vice president and deputy chief privacy officer, wrote in a letter sent to lawmakers.
The proposal could also drive companies out of state to avoid the regulations, the state’s Chamber of Commerce said.
Opponents want to wait for more guidance from the federal government. Proponents of the bill said California cannot wait, citing hard lessons they learned not acting soon enough to reign in social media companies.
State lawmakers were also considering Tuesday another ambitious measure to fight automation discrimination when companies use AI models to screen job resumes and rental apartment applications.
veryGood! (43785)
Related
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- These 5 charts show how life got pricier but also cheaper in 2023
- Authorities identify remains found by hikers 47 years ago near the Arizona-Nevada border
- Kamar de Los Reyes, 'One Life to Live' soap star and husband to Sherri Saum, dead at 56
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Georgia museum hosts awkward family photos exhibit as JCPennys Portraits trend takes off
- Authorities identify remains found by hikers 47 years ago near the Arizona-Nevada border
- Kansas spent more than $10M on outside legal fees defending NCAA infractions case
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Horoscopes Today, December 26, 2023
Ranking
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- NFL MVP race turned on its head as Brock Purdy implodes, Lamar Jackson rises in Ravens' rout
- Offshore wind in the U.S. hit headwinds in 2023. Here's what you need to know
- Georgia museum hosts awkward family photos exhibit as JCPennys Portraits trend takes off
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Colombia’s ELN rebels say they will only stop kidnappings for ransom if government funds cease-fire
- Mahomes, Purdy, Prescott: Who are the best QBs of the season? Ranking the top 10 before Week 17
- Feds want to hunt one kind of owl to save another kind of owl. Here's why.
Recommendation
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
Well-intentioned mental health courts can struggle to live up to their goals
Tax season can be terrifying. Here's everything to know before filing your taxes in 2024.
Lamar Jackson fires back at broadcaster's hot take about the Ravens
John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
1st Amendment claim struck down in Project Veritas case focused on diary of Biden’s daughter
Lucky NFL fan from NJ turns $5 into $489,383 after predicting a 14-pick parlay bet
The year when the girl economy roared